<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art><ui>1746-1596-6-93</ui><ji>1746-1596</ji><fm>
<dochead>Research</dochead>
<bibl>
<title>
<p>Computerized texture analysis of atypical immature myeloid precursors in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: an entity between blasts and promyelocytes</p>
</title>
<aug>
<au id="A1"><snm>Vido</snm><mi>R</mi><fnm>Joyce</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>joycericovido@yahoo.com.br</email></au>
<au id="A2"><snm>Adam</snm><mi>L</mi><fnm>Randall</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>randalladam@yahoo.com.br</email></au>
<au id="A3"><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><mi>GH</mi><fnm>Irene</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>ilmetze@unicamp.br</email></au>
<au ca="yes" id="A4"><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>Konradin</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>kmetze@fcm.unicamp.br</email></au>
</aug>
<insg>
<ins id="I1"><p>Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Rua Tessalia Vieira de Camargo 126, 13083-887, Campinas, Brazil</p></ins>
<ins id="I2"><p>Institute of Computing, State University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein 1251, 13083-852, Campinas, Brazil</p></ins>
<ins id="I3"><p>Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Rua Tessalia Vieira de Camargo 126, 13083-887, Campinas, Brazil</p></ins>
</insg>
<source>Diagnostic Pathology</source>
<issn>1746-1596</issn>
<pubdate>2011</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>93</fpage>
<url>http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/6/1/93</url>
<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-6-93</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21958512</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
</bibl>
<history><rec><date><day>3</day><month>8</month><year>2011</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>29</day><month>9</month><year>2011</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>29</day><month>9</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
<cpyrt><year>2011</year><collab>Vido et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
<kwdg>
<kwd>myelodysplastic syndromes</kwd>
<kwd>bone marrow</kwd>
<kwd>nuclear texture</kwd>
<kwd>cell atypias</kwd>
<kwd>karyometry</kwd>
<kwd>morphometry</kwd>
<kwd>fractal</kwd>
<kwd>chromatin</kwd>
<kwd>co-occurrence matrix</kwd>
<kwd>computerized pathology</kwd>
</kwdg>
<abs>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Abstract</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Bone marrow (BM) blast count is an essential parameter for classification and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, a high degree of cell atypias in bone marrow hemopoietic cells may be found in this group of clonal disorders, making it difficult to quantify precisely myeloblasts, and to distinguish them from promyelocytes and atypical immature myeloid precursors. Our aim was to investigate whether computerized image analysis of routine cytology would help to characterize these cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<p>In May-Gr&#252;nwald-Giemsa stained BM smears of 30 newly diagnosed MDS patients and 19 cases of normal BM, nuclei of blasts and promyelocytes were digitalized and interactively segmented. The morphological classification of the cells was done by consensus of two observers. Immature granulocytic precursors, which could not be clearly classified either as blasts or promyelocytes, were called "atypic myeloid precursors". Nuclear morphometry and texture features derived from the co-occurrence matrix and fractal dimension (FD) were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>In normal BM, when compared to myeloblasts, nuclei of promyelocytes showed significant increase in perimeter and local texture homogeneity and a decrease in form factor, chromatin gray levels, Haralick's entropy, inertia, energy, contrast, diagonal moment, cluster prominence, the fractal dimension according to Minkowski and its goodness-of-fit. Compared to normal myeloblast nuclei, the chromatin texture of MDS myeloblasts revealed higher local homogeneity and goodness-of-fit of the FD, but lower values of entropy, contrast, diagonal moment, and fractal dimension. The same differences were found between nuclei of normal promyelocytes and those of MDS. Nuclei of atypical myeloid precursors showed intermediate characteristics between those of blasts and promyelocytes according to the quantitative features (perimeter, form factor, gray level and its standard deviation), but were similar to promyelocytes according to the texture variables inertia, energy, contrast, diagonal moment, cluster prominence, and Minkowski's fractal dimension.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Conclusion</p>
</st>
<p>BM atypical immature myeloid precursors are difficult to be correctly classified in routine cytology. Although their cytoplasm is more similar to that of myeloblasts, computerized texture analysis indicates a nuclear chromatin remodeling more close to the promyelocyte, thus indicating an asynchronous intermediate maturation stage between blast and promyelocyte.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</abs>
</fm><bdy>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Background</p>
</st>
<p>Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of hemopoietic clonal disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and a cellular bone marrow (BM) showing cell atypias that reflect abnormalities in proliferation, maturation and apoptosis of hemopoietic precursors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. According to WHO criteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> the percentage of blasts counted in BM cytology is an essential parameter for diagnosis and classification of the several types of MDS, as well as for the differential diagnosis between refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) and acute myeloid leukemia. In normal hemopoiesis, strict morphological criteria can easily be used to define each stage of cell maturation, but in MDS, immature cells presenting an asynchronous maturation may often be difficult to classify <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Standardized morphologic criteria have been recommended <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> in order to separate MDS blasts and MDS promyelocytes. Yet, there is always some degree of subjectivity, although the FAB Group <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and the International Working Group on MDS <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> had defined classification criteria, which were also included in the 2008 WHO classification <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Moreover, the European LeukemiaNet published in the Internet a consensus-based cell library elaborated by experienced morphologists <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> that could be used as a guide for daily work and training. Despite of these efforts, the morphologic diagnosis continues to be a difficult task, and the morphologic diagnosis of MDS should only be done by a consensus of two expert morphologists <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In cytological bone marrow smears of MDS patients, some immature cells may not be classifiable in a satisfactory way, because they show simultaneously characteristics of blasts and promyelocytes, thus not fulfilling the criteria of either category. This problem is known to the practicing hematologist, but, surprisingly not discussed in the scientific literature.</p>
<p>In recent years, virtual microscopy and computerized image analysis gained increasing importance <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. These techniques have been widely used in pathology and cytology for the differentiation of normal cells, benign and malignant tumors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, as prognostic markers in malignancy <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and in order to examine chromatin remodeling of cells in culture after incubation with carcinogens <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, hormones <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and therapeutic agents <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Computerized image analysis has shown to be a fast and reliable way for quantitative morphologic analysis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, and moreover, to be a possibility to detect subtle morphologic changes which cannot be recognized by conventional microscopy even by an expert.</p>
<p>The aim of the present study was to examine whether computerized nuclear texture analysis could help to characterize in a more objective way the blasts and promyelocytes in normal bone marrow, as well as in patients with MDS. We also wanted to examine if this technology was able to classify atypical immature myeloid cells present in bone marrow smears of these patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Methods</p>
</st>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Patients</p>
</st>
<p>Routinely May-Gr&#252;nwald-Giemsa-stained bone marrow (BM) slides from 19 morphologically normal bone marrows and from 30 consecutive cases of MDS were used for this analysis. Morphologically normal BM smears (control group) were obtained from the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, with hypersplenism, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma without bone marrow involvement. The diagnosis of MDS was based on the presence of sustained peripheral (PB) cytopenias, cell atypias in BM cytology and BM cytogenetics according to WHO 2008 criteria <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>This project was approved by the Ethic's Comitee of our Institution (Proc 0652.0.146.000-08).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Image analysis</p>
</st>
<p>At least 30 consecutive nuclei of each type of immature granulocytic precursors (myeloblasts and promyelocytes) per patient were analyzed. Cells were classified by two independent experts (JRV and ILM) according to the criteria of the European Leukemianet Project <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp> (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). We considered as "atypical immature myeloid precursors" (Figure <figr fid="F1">1C</figr>) cells without cytoplasmic Golgi apparatus, but with nuclear characteristics resembling more mature cells than myeloblasts, and that did not fulfill the proposed criteria for classification <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Immature granulocytic precursors observed in the MDS cases</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Immature granulocytic precursors observed in the MDS cases</b>. A: myeloblast. B: promyelocyte. C: atypical immature granulocytic precursor. May-Gr&#252;nwald-Giemsa &#215;1000.</p>
</text><graphic file="1746-1596-6-93-1"/></fig>
<p>Cell images were captured by a Leica DC 500 digital system (bmp-format; sample spacing of 0.1 &#956;m/pixel, 1.25 numerical aperture, 100x oil immersion objective). The nuclear images were interactively segmented, converted to grayscale format with gray levels ranging between 0 and 255 (being 255 the brightest). We examined variables of geometric morphometry such as nuclear area, form factor, mean gray level, and standard deviation of gray values. We also calculated texture features derived from the co-occurrence matrix <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and the fractal dimension (FD) according to Minkowski-Bouligand after pseudo-3D transformation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, as well as its goodness of fit (R<sup>2</sup>) <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Statistical analysis</p>
</st>
<p>We compared the values obtained for normal myeloblasts and promyelocytes for all nuclear morphometric and texture features using the t-test for paired values. Student's t-test was used to compare morphometric and texture features of normal and MDS blasts and of normal and MDS promyelocytes. In a third step, the differences between features of blasts, promyelocytes and atypical myeloid precursors of MDS patients were calculated by analysis of variance for repeated measures. Differences between blast and atypical myeloid precursors or between the latter and promyelocytes were calculated with the help of t-tests for paired values.</p>
<p>For every nuclear morphometric or texture feature we tried to find out whether the values of the atypical myeloid precursors were more similar to those of MDS-blasts (no significant difference between atypical precursors and blasts, but between atypical precursors and promyelocytes), or MDS-promyelocytes (significant difference between blasts and atypical precursors but no significant difference between atypical precursors and promyelocytes). A nuclear characteristic was considered to be "intermediate" between MDS-blasts and MDS-promyelocytes, when significant differences were found both between MDS-blasts and atypical precursors and between atypical precursors and MDS-promyelocytes. A variable was called "not defined", when the global test or both dependent t-tests were not significant (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Results</p>
</st>
<p>Diagnostic smears from 19 normal BM and 30 cases of MDS were examined. Median age of the patients with normal BM was 57 years (24 - 85; 9 males and 10 females). The median age of the MDS patients was 64 years (30 - 85). There were 16 males and 14 females (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). According to the WHO type, most cases were RCMD (refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia) and RAEB (refractory anemia with excess of blasts).</p>
<tbl id="T1"><title><p>Table 1</p></title><caption><p>Age and hematological data of the MDS cases (median)</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>WHO type</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>RA/RARS*</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>RCMD**</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>RAEB***</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Number of cases</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>15</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>11</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Age (years)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>64</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>64</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>62</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Hemoglobin (g/dL)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>10.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>PB leukocytes (&#215;10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup>)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.1</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>PB platelets (&#215;10<sup>3</sup>/mm<sup>3</sup>)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>234</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>240</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>184</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>BM Blasts %</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>1.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.0</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* RA/RARS = refractory anemia/sideroblastic anemia; ** RCMD = refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia; *** RAEB = refractory anemia with excess of blasts</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>In normal BM, nuclei of promyelocytes showed significant changes, such as an increase of perimeter and local texture homogeneity and a decrease in form factor, chromatin gray levels, Haralick's entropy, inertia, energy, contrast, diagonal moment, cluster prominence, Minkowski's fractal dimension and its goodness-of-fit when compared with that of normal blasts (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
<tbl id="T2"><title><p>Table 2</p></title><caption><p>Mean values of the variables obtained for normal granulocytic precursors</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Blasts</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Promyelocytes</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>P</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Area &#956;<sup>2</sup></p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>111.9</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>112.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.75</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Perimeter</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>579</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>636</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Form factor</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.957</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.792</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Mean gray level</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>129.3</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>120.8</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>SD gray level*</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.04</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Haralick's entropy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.77</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.02</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Inertia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.82</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Local homogeneity</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.535</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.538</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.51</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Energy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7177</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6430</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Contrast</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.82</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diagonal Moment</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>19.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Cluster prominence</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.38</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.79</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>FD** Minkowski</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.134</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.128</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.08</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>R<sup>2 </sup>***</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99647</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99613</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.007</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* SD = standard deviation; ** FD = fractal dimension, ***R<sup>2 </sup>goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Compared to normal myeloblast nuclei, chromatin texture of MDS blasts had a higher local homogeneity as well as goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension, but a lower entropy, contrast, diagonal moment, and fractal dimension (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). Nuclei of promyelocytes from MDS showed a larger nuclear area, local homogeneity and goodness-of-fit of FD, but lower inertia, entropy, energy, contrast, diagonal moment and FD than normal ones (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>).</p>
<tbl id="T3"><title><p>Table 3</p></title><caption><p>Mean values of the variables that differed in normal myeloblasts and those of MDS</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Normal</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MDS</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>p</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Haralick's entropy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.90</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.65</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Inertia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Local homogeneity</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.535</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.553</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Energy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7177</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6749</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>n.s</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Contrast</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>4.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diagonal moment</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>19.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.05</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>FD Minkowski *</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.134</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.122</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>R<sup>2</sup>**</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99647</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99819</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.005</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* FD = fractal dimension. **R<sup>2 </sup>goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<tbl id="T4"><title><p>Table 4</p></title><caption><p>Mean values of the variables that differed in normal promyelocytes and those of MDS</p></caption><tblbdy cols="4">
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Normal</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MDS</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>
                  <it>p</it>
               </b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="4">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Haralick's entropy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.77</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.52</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.03</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Inertia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.82</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.28</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Local homogeneity</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.538</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.558</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Energy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6430</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5595</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.04</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Contrast</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.82</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.28</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diagonal moment</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17.7</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>15.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.02</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>FD Minkowski *</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.128</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.118</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.03</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>R<sup>2 </sup>**</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99613</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99809</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.001</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* FD = fractal dimension. **R<sup>2 </sup>goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>The values obtained for nuclei of granulocytic precursors in MDS are presented in Table <tblr tid="T5">5</tblr>.</p>
<tbl id="T5"><title><p>Table 5</p></title><caption><p>Mean values of the variables in the granulocytic precursors in MDS</p></caption><tblbdy cols="8">
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>
               <b>Nuclear morphometric or texture feature</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MDS-Blasts</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>MDS Blast vs atyp</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Atyp.</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>p </it>atyp. vs. MDS Pro.</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>MDS Pro</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b><it>P </it>global</b>
            </p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>
               <b>Classification of atypical myeloid precursors</b>
            </p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c cspan="8">
            <hr/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>&#193;rea [&#956;2 ]</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>118.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.95</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>118.5</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.37</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>121.0</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.60</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>(not defined)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Perimeter</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>598</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>628</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.004</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>656</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Intermediate</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Form factor</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.94</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.85</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0005</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.80</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Intermediate</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Mean gray level</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>125.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0009</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>121.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0227</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>118.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.00001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>intermediate</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>SD* gray value</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>9.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.02</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>8.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>Intermediate</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Haralick's entropy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.65</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.11</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.59</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.083</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>7.52</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.01</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>(not defined)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Inertia</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0038</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.39</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.095</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.28</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Local homogeneity</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.553</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.32</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.555</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.23</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.558</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.12</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>(not defined)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Energy</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>6749</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00003</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5748</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.39</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>5595</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Contrast</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.67</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0038</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.39</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.095</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.28</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Diagonal moment</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>17.4</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.00058</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>16.1</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.098</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>15.6</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>&lt;0.0001</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>Cluster prominence</p>
            <p>(10<sup>-5</sup>)</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>3.17</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.021</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.39</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.51</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.19</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.018</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
         <c>
            <p/>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>FD****</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.1225</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0015</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.1183</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.82</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>2.1180</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.0015</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>close to MDS Pro.</p>
         </c>
      </r>
      <r>
         <c ca="left">
            <p>R2*****</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99819</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.026</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99807</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.65</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.99809</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>0.068</p>
         </c>
         <c ca="center">
            <p>(not defined)</p>
         </c>
      </r>
   </tblbdy><tblfn>
      <p>* atyp. = immature atypical myeloid precursors; **pro. = promyelocyte; *** SD = Standard deviation of gray value levels, **** FD = fractal dimension, *****R2 goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension</p>
   </tblfn></tbl>
<p>Nuclei of atypical myeloid precursors showed intermediate characteristics between those of blasts and promyelocytes according to the quantitative features perimeter, form factor, gray level and its standard deviation, but were similar to promyelocytes according to the texture variables inertia, energy, contrast, diagonal moment, cluster prominence and Minkowski's fractal dimension. None of the features studied showed closeness to myeloblasts. These findings were independent of the WHO type of MDS.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Discussion</p>
</st>
<p>In recent years, computerized image analysis has been widely used in histology and cytology in order to examine tissue differentiation, for tumor classification <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and for the search of new prognostic variables in neoplasias <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. This approach has also been used in basic research for analyzing nuclear texture changes that reflect chromatin remodeling of cells after incubation with carcinogens <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, hormones <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
</abbrgrp> and therapeutic agents <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>Chromatin remodeling, which is primarily due to epigenetic events, can be found during cell differentiation or malignant transformation <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. In normal hemopoiesis, gene expression during normal cell maturation is controlled by genetic and epigenetic changes <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Blast cells in acute myeloid leukemia and MDS always present epigenetic abnormalities and their DNA methylation signature is different to that of any stage of normal myeloid maturation, an observation which permits to distinguish normal and leukemic blasts <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
</abbrgrp>.</p>
<p>In the present study we examined the utility of computerized chromatin texture analysis for the diagnosis of normal and atypical immature myeloid precursors in routine BM smears. In normal BM, all except three of the quantitative features examined, presented significant differences between blasts and promyelocytes. Thus, chromatin texture analysis in routine BM cytology is able to define cells in early stages of myeloid maturation.</p>
<p>In MDS, genetic and epigenetic alterations provoke abnormalities of proliferation, maturation, and apoptosis <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
</abbrgrp>, which, of course, are reflected in subtle alterations of the chromatin structure. The expression of various lineage and maturation-related membrane proteins may be discordant in granulopoietic precursors <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
</abbrgrp> provoking also morphological atypias. All these alterations hamper the cell classification. The difficulties in classify several cases with MDS are well known. The European LeukemiaNet created a consensus-based cell library elaborated by experienced morphologists and downloaded it in the Internet <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Its purpose is to be a guide for daily work and training. Furthermore, it is still recommended that the morphologic diagnosis of MDS should be achieved by a consensus of two experienced morphologists <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Our study underlines these problems of classification. The cells diagnosed as atypical immature myeloid precursors in the present study did not - on light microscopic examination - reveal a Golgi apparatus, and would be therefore morphologically classified as blasts. However, the nucleus showed features more close to that of promyelocytes or nuclei of an "intermediate" state between blasts and promyelocytes.</p>
<p>Computerized texture analysis confirmed this subjective impression, since 4 features presented intermediate values between blasts and promyelocytes and 6 variables pointed out a similarity with nuclei of promyelocytes. Although the cytoplasm in these atypical cells still reveals characteristics of a blast, the nuclear structure is more similar to a promyelocyte, thus indicating an asynchronous maturation in MDS patients.</p>
<p>The existence of this intermediate maturation stage is of clinical importance. Cytologists basing their diagnosis mainly on cytoplasmic criteria will count these atypical immature cells together with blasts and thus increase the blast count. Other observers, emphasizing the similarity of the nuclear features, might count them together with promyelocytes, or count them separately, thus diminishing the blast count. This may imply in a different classification for the patient.</p>
<p>The BM blast count is considered very important for the classification of MDS in the revised WHO classification <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
</abbrgrp> as well as for the determination of the IPSS and WPSS scores <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, the blast count is considered to be an independent prognostic feature of utmost importance in MDS <abbrgrp>
<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
</abbrgrp>. Therefore, additional pathophysiological and molecular studies should be performed in order to investigate whether these atypical precursor cells should not be counted as blasts, as suggested by our investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Competing interests</p>
</st>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Authors' contributions</p>
</st>
<p>JRV: collected all the clinical data, selected the material, classified the cells, acquired and segmented the cell images and reviewed the literature. RLA: developed the segmentation software and made all the computational analysis. ILM: provided the conception and design of the study, microscopic analysis, classification of the cells, drafting of the manuscript, and final approval. KM: participated in the study design, performed the statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and made the critical revision of the text.</p>
<p>This study is part of a master thesis of JRV (Postgraduate Course in Medical Pathophysiology, FCM, University of Campinas) with ILM as principal advisor and KM as co-advisor. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</bdy><bm>
<ack>
<sec>
<st>
<p>Acknowledgements</p>
</st>
<p>K. Metze is Professor, Postgraduate Courses in Pathophysiology and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Campinas and is researcher of the National Research Council (CNPq).</p>
<p>RL Adam is Research Associate, Institute of Computing, State University of Campinas</p>
<p>I. Lorand-Metze is Professor in Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Campinas, and is researcher of the National Research Council (CNPq).</p>
<p>This investigation was supported by the S&#227;o Paulo Research Foundation FAPESP (project 2007/52015-0) and the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development CNPq (projects 479074/2008-9 and 307270/2010-6 )</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Catovsky</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Daniel</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Flandrin</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Galton</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au><au><snm>Gralnick</snm><fnm>HR</fnm></au><au><snm>Sultan</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Br J Haematol</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>51</volume><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">6952920</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>International scoring system for evaluation in MDS</p></title><aug><au><snm>Greenberg</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Cox</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>LeBeau</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au><au><snm>Fenaux</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Morel</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanz</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanz</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Vallespi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Hamblin</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Oscier</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Ohyashiki</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Toyama</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Aul</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Mufti</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au></aug><source>Blood</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>89</volume><fpage>2079</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9058730</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>A comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of MDS after triage by morphology towards cytogenetics and other techniques</p></title><aug><au><snm>Haferlach</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Bacher</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Kern</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Schnittger</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Gassmann</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Haferlach</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Cancer Treat Rev</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>33</volume><fpage>S31</fpage><lpage>S41</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Factors influencing survival in myelodysplastic syndromes in a Brazilian population: Comparison of FAB and WHO classifications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Pinheiro</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>de Paula</snm><fnm>EV</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Leuk Res</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>587</fpage><lpage>594</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.leukres.2003.11.001</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15120935</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of Fas/Fasl in bone marrow CD34+ cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: relation to disease progression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>CSP</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Leuk &amp; Lymph</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>45</volume><fpage>309</fpage><lpage>313</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10428190310001598044</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21962559</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Definitions and standards in the diagnosis and treatment of the myelodysplastic syndromes: Consensus statements and report from a working conference</p></title><aug><au><snm>Valent</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Horny</snm><fnm>HP</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>JM</fnm></au><au><snm>Fonatsch</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Germing</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Greenberg</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Haferlach</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Haase</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kolb</snm><fnm>HJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Krieger</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Loken</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>van de Loosdrecht</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ogata</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Orfao</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfeilst&#246;cker</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>R&#252;ter</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Sperr</snm><fnm>WR</fnm></au><au><snm>Stauder</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Wells</snm><fnm>DA</fnm></au></aug><source>Leuk Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>31</volume><fpage>727</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.leukres.2006.11.009</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17257673</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>WHO classification of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues</p></title><aug><au><snm>Swerdlow</snm><fnm>SH</fnm></au><au><snm>Campo</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Harris</snm><fnm>NL</fnm></au><au><snm>Jaffe</snm><fnm>ES</fnm></au><au><snm>Pileri</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Stein</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Thiele</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Vardiman</snm><fnm>JW</fnm></au></aug><publisher>IARC press Lyon, France</publisher><pubdate>2008</pubdate><fpage>18</fpage><lpage>30</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>New definitions for blast cells in AML and MDS with validation by virtual microscopy [abstract]</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goasguen</snm><fnm>JE</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bain</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Brunning</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Vallespi</snm><fnm>MT</fnm></au><au><snm>Cox</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Mufti</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Leuk Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>31</volume><issue>suppl 1</issue><fpage>S25</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>European Leukemianet (ELN) project Diagnostic Platform (WP10): final results of the first study of the European Morphology Consensus Panel [abstract]</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zini</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Bain</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Castoldi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Cortez</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Csomor</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Faber</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Giagounidis</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Haferlach</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Kacirkova</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Lewandowski</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Liso</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Matutes</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Maynadi&#232;</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Meletis</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Powit</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au><au><snm>Sreter</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Tichelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Vallespi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>van&apos;t Veer</snm><fnm>MB</fnm></au><au><snm>Woessner</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>B&#233;n&#233;</snm><fnm>MC</fnm></au></aug><source>Blood</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>112</volume><fpage>1645</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Integration and acceleration of virtual microscopy as the key to successful implementation into the routine diagnostic process</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wienert</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Beil</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Saeger</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hufnagl</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Schrader</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>4</fpage><note>3</note></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran</p></title><aug><au><snm>Izadi-Mood</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Yarmohammadi</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ahmadi</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Irvanloo</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Haeri</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Meysamie</snm><fnm>AP</fnm></au><au><snm>Khaniki</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>4</volume><fpage>10</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-4-10</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2681452</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">19317919</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Automatic measurement of epithelium differentiation and classification of cervical intraneoplasia by computerized image analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Jondet</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Agoli-Agbo</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Dehennin</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>7</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-5-7</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2819044</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">20148100</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>An experimental study of pathologist's navigation patterns in virtual microscopy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Roa-Pe&#241;a</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#243;mez</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Romero</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>71</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-5-71</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3001424</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21087502</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Interactive and automated application of virtual microscopy</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kayser</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>G&#246;rtler</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Borkenfeld</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Kayser</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>6</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>S10</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S10</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3073203</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21489181</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Baak</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Snijders</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>van Diermen</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>van Diest</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Diepenhorst</snm><fnm>FW</fnm></au><au><snm>Benraadt</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>21</volume><fpage>4214</fpage><lpage>4221</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.2003.02.087</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14615450</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Application of the Minkowski-Bouligand fractal dimension for the differential diagnosis of thyroid follicular neoplasias</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>de Matos</snm><fnm>PS</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Leite</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Cell Oncol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17167186</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Phenotypic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia associated with different nuclear chromatin texture</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mello</snm><fnm>MRB</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Pereira</snm><fnm>FG</fnm></au><au><snm>Magalh&#227;es</snm><fnm>MG</fnm></au><au><snm>Machado</snm><fnm>CG</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Anal Quant Cytol Histol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">18630843</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Fractal dimension is an independent prognostic factor for survival in melanoma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bedin</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>S&#225;</snm><fnm>BCS</fnm></au><au><snm>Landman</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>BMC Cancer</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>10</volume><fpage>260</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-10-260</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2902442</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20525386</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Goodness-of-fit of the fractal dimension as a prognostic factor</p></title><aug><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Leite</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au></aug><source>Cell Oncol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>31</volume><fpage>503</fpage><lpage>504</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19940366</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>Fractal Characteristics of May-Gr&#252;nwald-Giemsa stained Chromatin are Independent Prognostic Factors for Survival in Multiple Myeloma</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ferro</snm><fnm>DP</fnm></au><au><snm>Falconi</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Ortega</snm><fnm>MM</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>CSP</fnm></au><au><snm>de Souza</snm><fnm>CA</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS One</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>e20706</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">3116829</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21698234</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>DNA content and chromatin texture of human breast epithelial cells transformed with 17-beta-estradiol and the estrogen antagonist ICI 182,780 as assessed by image analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mello</snm><fnm>MLS</fnm></au><au><snm>Vidal</snm><fnm>BC</fnm></au><au><snm>Russo</snm><fnm>IH</fnm></au><au><snm>Lareef</snm><fnm>MH</fnm></au><au><snm>Russo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Mutat Res-Rev Mutat</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>617</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Computer-assisted image analysis of breast fine needle aspiration in a randomized chemoprevention trial of fenretinide vs. placebo in HRT users</p></title><aug><au><snm>Serrano</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Gandini</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Mariani</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Bonanni</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Santinelli</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Guerrieri-Gonzaga</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Pelosi</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Cassano</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Montironi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Decensi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Breast</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>17</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>97</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.038</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17768053</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Valproic acid causes dose- and time-dependent changes in nuclear structure in prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kortenhorst</snm><fnm>MSQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Isharwal</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Van Diest</snm><fnm>PJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Chowdhury</snm><fnm>WH</fnm></au><au><snm>Marlow</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Carducci</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rodriguez</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Veltri</snm><fnm>RW</fnm></au></aug><source>Mol Cancer Ther</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>8</volume><fpage>802</fpage><lpage>08</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1076</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2676893</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19372553</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Differential modulation of nuclear texture, histone acetilation and MDR1 gene expression in human drug-sensitive and resistant OV1 cell lines</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yatouji</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>El-Khoury</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Trentesaux</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Trussardi-Regnier</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Benabidet</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Bontems</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Dufer</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Int J Oncol</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>1003</fpage><lpage>09</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17332941</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><title><p>Texture and object-related automated information analysis in histological still images of various organs</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kayser</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoshang</snm><fnm>SA</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Goldmann</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Vollmer</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Radziszowski</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Kosjerina</snm><fnm>Z</fnm></au><au><snm>Mireskandari</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Kayser</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Anal Quant Cytol Histol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>30</volume><fpage>323</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid">19160697</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Fractal dimension of chromatin and cancer prognosis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Epigenomics</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>601</fpage><lpage>604</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.2217/epi.10.50</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>Changes of texture features due to image compression</p></title><aug><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Leite</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Diagn Pathol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>5</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>S15</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1746-1596-5-S1-S15</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Robust variables in texture analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Ferreira</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au></aug><source>Pathology</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>42</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>610</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3109/00313025.2010.508794</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20854091</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>The fractal dimension of nuclear chromatin as a prognostic factor in acute precursor B lymphoblastic leukemia</p></title><aug><au><snm>Adam</snm><fnm>RL</fnm></au><au><snm>Silva</snm><fnm>RC</fnm></au><au><snm>Pereira</snm><fnm>FG</fnm></au><au><snm>Leite</snm><fnm>NJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Cell Oncol</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>28</volume><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16675881</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B30"><title><p>Epigenetics in AML</p></title><aug><au><snm>Melnick</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au></aug><source>Best Pract Res Clin Haematol</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>23</volume><fpage>463</fpage><lpage>468</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.beha.2010.09.017</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21130408</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B31"><title><p>Reduced levels of poly (ADP-ribosyl)ation result in chromatin compaction and hypermethylation as shown by cell-by-cell computer-assisted quantitative analysis</p></title><aug><au><snm>De Capoa</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Febbo</snm><fnm>FR</fnm></au><au><snm>Giovannelli</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Niveleau</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Zardo</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Marenzi</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Caiafa</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>FASEB J</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9872933</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B32"><title><p>The impact of several phenotypic features at diagnosis on survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Reis-Alves</snm><fnm>SC</fnm></au><au><snm>Traina</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Saad</snm><fnm>ST</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Neoplasma</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>57</volume><fpage>530</fpage><lpage>536</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.4149/neo_2010_06_530</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20845991</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B33"><title><p>Molecular pathways in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: relationships and distinctions-a review</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bernasconi</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Br J Haematol</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>142</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>708</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07245.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18540941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B34"><title><p>Detection of hematopoietic maturation abnormalities by flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes and its utility for the differential diagnosis with non-clonal disorders</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lorand-Metze</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Ribeiro</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lima</snm><fnm>CSP</fnm></au><au><snm>Batista</snm><fnm>LS</fnm></au><au><snm>Metze</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Leuk Res</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>31</volume><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.leukres.2006.04.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16750852</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B35"><title><p>Blast counts in bone marrow aspirate smears</p></title><aug><au><snm>Vollmer</snm><fnm>RT</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Clin Pathol</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>131</volume><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1309/AJCPBAYNCU35ZGZG</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19141378</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B36"><title><p>Diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndrome: International Working Group on Morphology of myelodysplastic syndrome consensus proposals for the definition and enumeration of myeloblasts and ring sideroblasts</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mufti</snm><fnm>GJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Bennett</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Goasguen</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Bain</snm><fnm>BJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Baumann</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Brunning</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Cazzola</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Fenaux</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Germing</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Hellstr&#246;m-Lindberg</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Jinnai</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Manabe</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Matsuda</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Niemeyer</snm><fnm>CM</fnm></au><au><snm>Sanz</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Tomonaga</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Vallespi</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Yoshimi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au></aug><source>Haematologica</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>93</volume><fpage>1712</fpage><lpage>1717</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.3324/haematol.13405</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18838480</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B37"><title><p>Coalesced multicentric analysis of 2,351 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes indicates an underestimation of poor-risk cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes in the international prognostic scoring system</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schanz</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Steidl</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Fonatsch</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Pfeilst&#246;cker</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>N&#246;sslinger</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Tuechler</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Valent</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Hildebrandt</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Giagounidis</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Aul</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>L&#252;bbert</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Stauder</snm><fnm>r</fnm></au><au><snm>Krieger</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Garcia-Manero</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Kantarjian</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Germing</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au><au><snm>Haase</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Estey</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au></aug><source>J Clin Oncol</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>29</volume><fpage>1963</fpage><lpage>1970</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1200/JCO.2010.28.3978</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21519021</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
</bm></art>