Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Diagnostic Pathology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Exome sequencing identified new mutations in a Marfan syndrome family

Guangxin Li1, Jian Yu2, Kun Wang1, Bin Wang1, Minghai Wang1, Shuguang Zhang1, Shiyong Qin1 and Zhenhai Yu1*

  • * Corresponding author: Zhenhai Yu sdyzh56@163.com

  • † Equal contributors

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Qianfoshan Hospital, No.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China

2 Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China

For all author emails, please log on.

Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:25  doi:10.1186/1746-1596-9-25


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/25


Received:24 November 2013
Accepted:11 January 2014
Published:31 January 2014

© 2014 Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Abstract

Marfan syndrome is a common autosomal dominant hereditary connective tissue disorder. There is no cure for Marfan syndrome currently. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is efficient to identify genetic lesions at the exome level. Here we carried out exome sequencing of two Marfan syndrome patients. Further Sanger sequencing validation in other five members from the same family was also implemented to confirm new variants which may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Two new variants, including one nonsense SNP in the Marfan syndrome gene FBN1 and one missense mutation in exon 15 of LRP1, which may be related to the phenotype of the patients were identified. The exome sequencing analysis provides us a new insight into the molecular events governing pathogenesis of Marfan syndrome.

Virtual slide

http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1229110069114125 webcite.

Keywords:
Exome sequencing; New mutations; Marfan syndrome; FBN1; RP1

Introduction

Marfan syndrome is a common autosomal dominant hereditary connective tissue disorder with prominent manifestations in different organ systems, including cardiovascular, ocular, and skeletal system [1]. Globally, about 1 in 5000 to 1 in 10,000 live newborns is affected without any racial, geographical or occupational predilection [1-3]. The Marfan syndrome gene, FBN1, was localized on chromosome 15q21 and cloned in 1991 [4]. Numerous therapy strategies have been proposed ever since. However, the mortality remains high and there is no cure for Marfan syndrome currently. This is mainly because the understanding of the underlying mechanism is still limited. Identify new genetic lesions of the disease may result in ideas which present alternatives of up to now inadequate therapy strategies.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies is efficient to identify genetic lesions at the exome level [5], especially for families that are not big enough for classical linkage studies. Studies on familial thoracic aortic disease [6] or other syndromes [7,8] which presents malformations overlapped with Marfan syndrome have identified new mutations which is likely responsible for the clinical phenotype. However, there is no exome-sequencing study specific for Marfan syndrome currently.

Here we carried out exome sequencing of two Marfan syndrome patients. Further Sanger sequencing validation in other five members from the same family was also implemented to confirm new variants which may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Our investigation here may provide new insights for the molecular mechanism of Marfan syndrome.

Materials and methods

Sample and DNA preparation

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Qianfoshan hospital approved the study. Prior to their participation, written informed documents were reviewed and obtained from all subjects. Pedigree of the family is shown in Figure 1. Peripheral blood was collected and genomic DNA was isolated from current available cases (3:1, 4:1, and 3:5) and several unaffected samples (3:2, 3:4, 3:6, and 3:7). The patients were diagnosed as Marfan syndrome according to the revised Ghent nosology [9] based on their reported family history and clinical features. Detail clinical information of all patients is listed in Table 1. All patients underwent ophthalmic examinations, systemic evaluations including skeletal features, physical examinations, measurement of the aortic root diameter and skin extensibility. All patients were hospitalized due to aortic aneurysm surgery. To identify variants underlying the disease in this family, affected individuals 3:5 and 4:1 were selected for exome-sequencing.

thumbnailFigure 1. Pedigree of Marfan syndrome family. Circles represent female participants and squares male participants. A slash through the symbol indicates that the family member is deceased. Black symbols indicate patients with Marfan syndrome. Small circles on the top right indicate members for whom whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing validation were carried out. Arrows on the top right indicate members for whom the PCR and Sanger sequencing validation were carried out.

Table 1. Clinical features of the patients

Exome sequencing

Exome sequencing was performed by using the SureSelect Human All Exon 50 Mb Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara). Genomic DNA was randomly fragmented into an average size of 500 bp by sonication. A pair of adaptors was ligated to both ends of the DNA fragments. The adaptor-ligated DNA products were then hybridized to the exome capture array to capture fragments in target regions. Afterwards, the captured fragments were amplified, purified and subjected to paired-end sequencing on the Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform (Illumina, CA, USA). The sequencing step was performed by WuXi AppTec Co.

Read mapping and variants calling

By using Fastx-tools (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html webcite), low quality reads were discarded (fractions of N bases over 10% or over half bases with quality score less than 5). BWA (version 0.5.9) [10] was used to map paired-end reads to the human reference assembly (hg19), which was obtained from the UCSC (University of California, Santa Cruz) database (http://genome.ucsc.edu webcite). PCR duplications were removed by using SAMtools software package (version 0.1.16) [11]. Reads that aligned to the target and adjacent regions of the two samples were collected and integrated into an “mpileup” file with SAMtools [11] for subsequent analysis. Variants including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions and deletions (indels) were then identified by using VarScan2 (version 2.2.8) [12] and filtered with default parameters. Briefly, the following criteria were used: read with non-reference calls with a frequency of over 20% after removing reads with mapping quality < 30 and base calls with base quality < 15; if three or more variants were found within any 10 bp windows, we discarded all variants. The identified SNVs and indels were annotated with the ANNOVAR software (http://www.openbioinformatics.org/annovar/ webcite).

Selection of potential causative variants

We focused on the variants which have not been reported in the dbSNP137 or NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP, https://esp.gs.washington.edu/drupal/ webcite) database before. The status of the variants in Asian population was further checked with the 1000 Genome data (http://www.1000genomes.org/ webcite). Variants which have been reported in dbSNP137 or EPS and in Asian populations of the 1000 genome were filtered. Variants shared by the two cases were considered to be potentially related to the disease. Since Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant hereditary disorder [13] and only one parent of our cases are affected cases, the causative variants here should be heterozygous. The impact of the shared heterozygous protein-altering variants was then confirmed by function prediction analysis using PROVEAN [14], SIFT [15], Polyphen-2 [16], FATHMM [17], MutationAssessor [18] and MutationTaster [19]. Protein-altering SNVs which are predicted to be damaging by at least three methods were considered as candidate causative variants. Further manual literature review was carried out to select variants involved in the pathogenesis of Marfan syndrome. The filtering process is illustrated in Figure 2.

thumbnailFigure 2. The filtering process of the selected variants for validation. EPS: NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project.

Validation of selected variants

Selected variants were further validated in the two sequencing samples and another patient 3:1 (Figure 1) by PCR and Sanger sequencing. To further confirm their association with the disease, the variants were also typed in 4 other unaffected samples in the family (Figure 1). Primers were designed by using the Primer Premier 5 software (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, Calif.). PCR amplification in 50 μl reaction was performed as follows: 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products purification was completed with the E.Z.N.A.® Gel Extraction Kit. Sanger sequencing was performed in both forward and reverse direction on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer. Sequence trace files were analyzed manually.

Results

We analyzed a four-generation Marfan syndrome family including 10 affected members. We sequenced the exome of two patients (Figure 1, 4:1 and 3:5). After target enrichment, whole exome DNA libraries from the two relatives were sequenced in 100 bp paired-end reads. A total of 21.86 Gb data were obtained and 10.72 Gb data were uniquely mapped the target region, achieving a mean depth of 97.2 × and 111.6 ×, respectively (Table 2). The coverage of target region for each sample was all over 99%. The capture rate for 4:1 and 3:5 was 70.40% and 65.94% respectively.

Table 2. Data summary of exome sequencing

Only uniquely mapped sequences (target and adjacent regions) were used for variants detection. Reads of the two samples were firstly integrated into an “mpileup” file with SAMtools [11]. Variants including SNPs and indels were then detected by using VarScan2 [12]. For the two affected samples, only one of their parents is Marfan syndrome patients (Figure 1). Thus, the causative variants here should be heterozygous. We focused on the heterozygous they shared in common for further analysis. In total, 2239 heterozygous protein-altering variants, including 2117 SNPs and 122 indels were detected in the two patients. After the filtering process, 212 variants, including 32 indels, 170 missense SNPs, and 10 nonsense SNPs were remained.

Based on literature review and the function prediction results (Figure 2), we selected 7 variants in 7 genes (Table 3) which may involve in the pathogenesis for further PCR and Sanger sequencing validation. All of the 7 variants were validated in the original two exome sequencing samples and another patient (3:1). As shown in Table 4, three variants were only detected in Marfan syndrome patients, including one nonframeshift deletion in DSC2, one missense SNPs in LRP1, and one stopgain SNP in FBN1. According to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation, DSC2 is involved in the Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy pathway (hsa05412). The LRP1 protein is involved in the RNA degradation process (hsa03018) and two diseases: Malaria (hsa05144) and Alzheimer's disease (hsa05010).

Table 3. Detail information of the selected variants

Table 4. Validation results of the seven selected variants

Discussion

We performed exome sequencing for two patients from a four-generation Marfan syndrome family to identify key genetic lesions contributing to the disease. Further PCR and Sanger sequencing for selected variants in the two sequencing patients, one another patient and 4 unaffected samples from the family was carried out for validation. Three new variants, including 1 deletion in DSC2, 1 missense SNPs in LRP1, and 1 nonsense SNP in FBN1 were confirmed to exist only in Marfan syndrome patients.

We reported a new nonsense mutation in exon 8 of FBN1 which is shared in three patients of the family (Figure 3). Defect of FBN1 has been considered to be the cause of Marfan syndrome since 1991 [20]. Protein encoded by FBN1 is connective protein fibrillin-1 [21], a matrix glyco protein widely distributed in elastic and nonelastic tissues. Incorporation of abnormal fibrillin proteins into microfibrils would result in structurally inferior connective tissues. Fibrillin-1 could bind to the latent form of TGFβ and inhibit TGFβ from exerting its biological activity. Reduced levels of normal fibrillin-1 result in increased level of TGFβ, which is deleterious for vascular smooth muscle development and the integrity of the extracellular matrix. Schrijver et al.[22] described that nonsense mutations of FBN1 appeared to be associated with more severe skeletal findings. Marfan patients with nonsense mutations of FBN1 were also reported to be with a significantly lower incidence of ectopia lentis [23]. In consistent with these findings, our patients showed severe skeletal abnormality and no sign of lens dislocation. In addition, aortic dissections were reported to be common in patients with nonsense mutations of FBN1[22]. Two of our patients were suffered from aortic dissections. Moreover, we didn’t detect any other protein-altering mutations in this gene. Further investigation on this point mutation is warranted.

thumbnailFigure 3. Sanger sequencing results for the three new identified variants. The id of each sample is in correspondence with that in Figure 1. The two arrows indicate positions of the nonsense SNP in FBN1 and the missense SNP in LRP1. For DSC2, the reverse chain was sequenced, and the identified deletion is shown in the red frame.

We also confirmed a missense mutation in exon 15 of LRP1 (Figure 3). Protein encoded by this gene is an endocytic receptor, which is a receptor for TGFβ1 and is required for TGFβ mediated inhibition of cell proliferation. Previous studies have reported that genetic variants of LRP1 and the reduction in LRP1 protein expression may be associated with aneurysm progression [24,25]. Since all our patients are suffered from aortic aneurysm and the new missense mutation of LRP1 is the only protein-altering variant we detected in this gene, it is possible that this damaging mutation results in dysfunction of the protein, contributing to the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysm. Therefore, the missense mutation we identified here may serve as a potential target for future research on Marfan patients with aortic aneurysm.

We also detected a deletion in DSC2 which is shared in all patients (Figure 3). The relationship of this gene and Marfan syndrome has not been reported before. According to the KEGG pathway annotation, the protein encoded by this gene is involved in the Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) pathway (hsa05412). Cardiovascular malformation is one of the prominent manifestations of Marfan syndrome. However, none of our patients were suffered from ARVC. Further investigation is needed to confirm the contribution of this mutation to Marfan syndrome.

Conclusion

In summary, exome sequencing of two Marfan syndrome patients and further Sanger sequencing validation in other members from the same family were carried out to identify new variants which may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Two new variants, including one nonsense SNP in the Marfan syndrome gene FBN1 and one missense mutation in exon 15 of LRP1, which may be related to the phenotype of the patients were identified. Thus, the exome sequencing analysis provides us a new insight into the molecular events governing the molecular mechanism of Marfan syndrome. The variants we identified here may provide new targets for further therapeutic investigations.

Competing interests

The authors have no financial competing interest.s

Authors’ contributions

ZY designed the research and interpreted data. GL and JY analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. KW,BW and MW recruited the samples and performed exome sequencing. SZ and SQ designed the validation experiment and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Ho NC, Tran JR, Bektas A: Marfan’s syndrome.

    Lancet 2005, 366:1978-1981. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Faivre L, Collod-Beroud G, Loeys BL, Child A, Binquet C, Gautier E, Callewaert B, Arbustini E, Mayer K, Arslan-Kirchner M, et al.: Effect of mutation type and location on clinical outcome in 1,013 probands with Marfan syndrome or related phenotypes and FBN1 mutations: an international study.

    Am J Hum Genet 2007, 81:454-466. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Pearson GD, Devereux R, Loeys B, Maslen C, Milewicz D, Pyeritz R, Ramirez F, Rifkin D, Sakai L, Svensson L, et al.: Report of the national heart, lung, and blood institute and national marfan foundation working group on research in marfan syndrome and related disorders.

    Circulation 2008, 118:785-791. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Dietz HC, Pyeritz RE: Mutations in the human gene for fibrillin-1 (FBN1) in the Marfan syndrome and related disorders.

    Hum Mol Genet 1995, 4 Spec No:1799-1809. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G: Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing.

    Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:685-696. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Boileau C, Guo DC, Hanna N, Regalado ES, Detaint D, Gong L, Varret M, Prakash SK, Li AH, d'Indy H, et al.: TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome.

    Nat Genet 2012, 44:916-921. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Rienhoff HY Jr, Yeo CY, Morissette R, Khrebtukova I, Melnick J, Luo S, Leng N, Kim YJ, Schroth G, Westwick J, et al.: A mutation in TGFB3 associated with a syndrome of low muscle mass, growth retardation, distal arthrogryposis and clinical features overlapping with Marfan and Loeys-dietz syndrome.

    Am J Med Genet A 2013, 161:2040-2046. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Classen CF, Riehmer V, Landwehr C, Kosfeld A, Heilmann S, Scholz C, Kabisch S, Engels H, Tierling S, Zivicnjak M, et al.: Dissecting the genotype in syndromic intellectual disability using whole exome sequencing in addition to genome-wide copy number analysis.

    Hum Genet 2013, 132:825-841. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Loeys BL, Dietz HC, Braverman AC, Callewaert BL, De Backer J, Devereux RB, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Jondeau G, Faivre L, Milewicz DM, et al.: The revised ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome.

    J Med Genet 2010, 47:476-485. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform.

    Bioinformatics 2010, 26:589-595. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R: The sequence alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

    Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2078-2079. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK: VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.

    Genome Res 2012, 22:568-576. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Gao LG, Luo F, Hui RT, Zhou XL: Recent molecular biological progress in Marfan syndrome and Marfan-associated disorders.

    Ageing Res Rev 2010, 9:363-368. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP: Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels.

    PLoS One 2012, 7:e46688. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  15. Ng PC, Henikoff S: SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:3812-3814. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  16. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

    Nat Methods 2010, 7:248-249. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GL, Edwards KJ, Day IN, Gaunt TR: Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models.

    Hum Mutat 2013, 34:57-65. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C: Determinants of protein function revealed by combinatorial entropy optimization.

    Genome Biol 2007, 8:R232. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D: MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations.

    Nat Methods 2010, 7:575-576. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. McKusick VA: The defect in Marfan syndrome.

    Nature 1991, 352:279-281. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Corson GM, Chalberg SC, Dietz HC, Charbonneau NL, Sakai LY: Fibrillin binds calcium and is coded by cDNAs that reveal a multidomain structure and alternatively spliced exons at the 5' end.

    Genomics 1993, 17:476-484. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Schrijver I, Liu W, Odom R, Brenn T, Oefner P, Furthmayr H, Francke U: Premature termination mutations in FBN1: distinct effects on differential allelic expression and on protein and clinical phenotypes.

    Am J Hum Genet 2002, 71:223-237. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Rommel K, Karck M, Haverich A, von Kodolitsch Y, Rybczynski M, Muller G, Singh KK, Schmidtke J, Arslan-Kirchner M: Identification of 29 novel and nine recurrent fibrillin-1 (FBN1) mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in 76 patients with Marfan syndrome.

    Hum Mutat 2005, 26:529-539. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Chan CY, Chan YC, Cheuk BL, Cheng SW: A pilot study on low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 in Chinese patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013, 46:549-556. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Bown MJ, Jones GT, Harrison SC, Wright BJ, Bumpstead S, Baas AF, Gretarsdottir S, Badger SA, Bradley DT, Burnand K, et al.: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with a variant in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1.

    Am J Hum Genet 2011, 89:619-627. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL