Table 1 |
|||||||||
| Comparison of results obtained by different methods for nonamplified and amplified cases (n = 64) | |||||||||
| Manual scoring | Tile-sampling analysis | Nuclei-sampling analysis | |||||||
| Automated analysis | After human correction | ||||||||
| Nonamplified | Equivocal | Amplified | Nonamplified | Equivocal | Amplified | Nonamplified | Equivocal | Amplified | |
| Nonamplified | 32 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Amplified | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
Furrer et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2013 8:17 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-17
