Table 1

Comparison of results obtained by different methods for nonamplified and amplified cases (n = 64)
Manual scoring Tile-sampling analysis Nuclei-sampling analysis
Automated analysis After human correction
Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified Nonamplified Equivocal Amplified
Nonamplified 32 0 0 32 0 0 32 0 0
Amplified 0 0 32 0 1 31 0 0 32

Furrer et al.

Furrer et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2013 8:17   doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-17

Open Data