Table 1 |
|||
|
Demographics and comparison of positive surgical margins between RALP and RRP |
|||
|
RALP |
RRP |
P |
|
|
|
|||
|
Case number |
182 |
80 |
|
|
Percentage |
69.5% |
30.5% |
|
|
Age |
60.8 ± 6.8* |
60.5 ± 6.8* |
0.772** |
|
Weight (gram) |
47.8 ± 16.1* |
40.1 ± 14.8* |
< 0.001** |
|
Gleason score |
6.5 ± 0.8* |
7.0 ± 0.8* |
< 0.001** |
|
Tumor volume (%) |
16.0 ± 13.6* |
18.8 ± 14.9* |
0.207 ** |
|
Pathologic stage |
0.305*** |
||
|
T2a |
28 (15.4%) |
6 (7.5%) |
|
|
T2b |
8 (4.4%) |
4 (5.0%) |
|
|
T2c |
112 (61.5%) |
51 (63.8%) |
|
|
T3 |
33 (18.1%) |
19 (23.8%) |
|
|
T4 |
1 (0.6%) |
0 (0.0%) |
|
|
Positive surgical margin (positive rate in parentheses) |
|||
|
All patients |
52 (28.6%) |
46 (57.5%) |
< 0.001** |
|
T2a & T2b |
8 (22.2%) |
3 (30.0%) |
0.610** |
|
T2c |
27 (24.1%) |
30 (58.8%) |
< 0.001** |
|
T3 & T4 |
17 (50.0%) |
13 (68.4%) |
0.194** |
|
|
|||
|
* Mean ± SD; ** Student t-test for the analysis between RALP and RRP; *** Chi-square test (T4 not included in the test) |
|||
|
Hong et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2012 7:24 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-7-24 |
|||
