diagnosticpathology.org/about
Bottom,Top,Right1
Table 1
Expression differences and clinical features of ABCG2 and V-ATPase in pathological grading and TNM staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Group
Cases
Expression of ABCG2
Expression of V-ATPase
-
+
++
Positive rate (%)
Statistical value
-
+
++
Positive rate (%)
Statistical value
Sex
Male
253
14
25
14
54.72
u = 188.5.0 P = 0.007
12
31
10
77.36
u = 164.0 P = 0.001
Female
13
8
5
0
38.46
9
4
0
30.77
Age
≤60
28
8
10
10
71.43
u = 408.0 P = 0.083
7
15
6
75.00
u = 439.0 P = 0.181
>60
38
14
20
4
63.16
14
20
4
63.16
pathological grading
I
15
13
0
2
13.33
P = 0.000
11
2
2
26.67
P = 0.003
α
24
6
17
1
75.00
6
17
1
75.00
β
27
3
13
11
88.89
4
16
7
85.19
Total
66
22
30
14
66.67
21
35
10
68.18
TNM staging
αa
27
18
9
0
33.33
P = 0.000
17
10
0
39.26
P = 0.000
αb
22
2
14
6
90.90
2
16
4
90.90
β
17
2
7
8
88.23
2
9
6
87.50
Total
66
22
29
14
66.67
21
35
10
68.18
Lymphatic metastasis
Yes
39
5
20
14
87.18
u = 192.5 P = 0.000
5
24
10
87.18
u = 227.0 P = 0.000
No
27
17
10
0
37.04
16
11
0
40.74
Huang
et al.
Diagnostic Pathology
2012
7
:180 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-7-180