Table 3 |
||||||
|
Perceptual quality measure results |
||||||
|
Itti's model |
Achanta's model |
Proposed model |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Train (dB) |
Test (dB) |
Train (dB) |
Test (dB) |
Train (dB) |
Test (dB) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
False fore-ground |
-57.3 ± 0.2 |
-56.0 ± 2.0 |
-60.6 ± 0.2 |
-59.3 ± 1.9 |
-52.7 ± 0.3 |
-51.2 ± 3.2 |
|
|
||||||
|
Added back- ground |
-58.7 ± 0.1 |
-57.3 ± 1.4 |
-50.8 ± 0.4 |
-48.8 ± 5.5 |
-52.0 ± 0.1 |
-51.6 ± 1.2 |
|
|
||||||
|
Total |
-61.8 ± 0.1 |
-60.3 ± 1.4 |
-63.0 ± 0.1 |
-61.6 ± 1.1 |
-57.7 ± 0.1 |
-56.7 ± 1.6 |
|
|
||||||
|
Average ± standard deviation of the perceptual quality in false foreground, added background and total quality for proposed and Itti's visual attention models obtained on the training and test sets. |
||||||
|
Gutiérrez et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2011 6:26 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-6-26 |
||||||