Table 1 |
|||
|
Sensitivity and specifity results |
|||
|
Method |
Magnifications |
Sensitivity (%) |
Specificity (%) |
|
|
|||
|
Itti's |
× 4 |
63.8 ± 5.8 |
62.5 ± 0.3 |
|
× 10 |
56.3 ± 5.8 |
60.3 ± 1.4 |
|
|
× 20 |
69.7 ± 2.8 |
73.5 ± 0.4 |
|
|
× 40 |
67.7 ± 3.8 |
73.8 ± 0.7 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Achanta's |
× 4 |
60.7 ± 8.8 |
62.6 ± 0.6 |
|
× 10 |
53.1 ± 7.8 |
60.6 ± 3.1 |
|
|
× 20 |
54.8 ± 5.8 |
69.6 ± 4.1 |
|
|
× 40 |
54.8 ± 3.8 |
74.7 ± 5.4 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Ours |
× 4 |
70.2 ± 13.8 |
56.5 ± 6.8 |
|
× 10 |
71.2 ± 9.8 |
52.1 ± 9.2 |
|
|
× 20 |
79.8 ± 6.8 |
77.6 ± 5.0 |
|
|
× 40 |
70.7 ± 8.8 |
75.8 ± 5.0 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Sensitivity and specificity of the different evaluated methods at different microscopical objective enlargements for the whole set of correctly (wrongly) classified pixels. |
|||
|
Gutiérrez et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2011 6:26 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-6-26 |
|||