Table 2 |
|||
|
α2,6 Sialic acid expression and distribution in samples with normal, LSIL, and HSIL |
|||
|
Normal |
|||
|
|
|||
|
# sample |
Basal |
Intermediate |
Superficial |
|
|
|||
|
15 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
16 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|||
|
26 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
30 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
34 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
Mean intensity |
0.6 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
LSIL |
|||
|
|
|||
|
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
13 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
21 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
22 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
35 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
38 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
41 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
43 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
48 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
Mean intensity |
0.7 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
HSIL |
|||
|
|
|||
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|||
|
17 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
18 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
20 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
23 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
24 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
33 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
39 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|||
|
49 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|||
|
Mean intensity |
1.8 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
|
|
|||
|
HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Lectin binding was evaluated as follows: 0, absent; 1, very low intensity; 2, low intensity; 3, medium intensity and 4, high intensity. The reaction intensity was evaluated in the different layers of the epithelium (Basal, Intermediate and Superficial) |
|||
|
López-Morales et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2010 5:74 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-5-74 |
|||