Table 2 |
||||
|
Relationship between MTDH and DCIS |
||||
|
Characteristics |
n |
MTDH expression |
||
|
|
||||
|
Low expression |
High expression |
p-value |
||
|
|
||||
|
ER |
||||
|
negative |
7 |
0 |
7 |
0.155 |
|
positive |
30 |
10 |
20 |
|
|
PR |
||||
|
negative |
9 |
0 |
9 |
0.079 |
|
positive |
28 |
10 |
18 |
|
|
ErbB-2 |
||||
|
negative |
28 |
10 |
18 |
0.079 |
|
positive |
9 |
0 |
9 |
|
|
Ki67 |
||||
|
low(≤ 10%) |
19 |
9 |
10 |
0.008 |
|
high(> 10%) |
18 |
1 |
17 |
|
|
Histological differentiation |
||||
|
L&I-DCIS |
22 |
9 |
13 |
0.028* |
|
H-DCIS |
15 |
1 |
14 |
|
|
|
||||
|
* p-value between low grade DCIS and high grade DCIS is 0.035 |
||||
|
Su et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2010 5:38 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-5-38 |
||||
