Table 1 |
|
|
Comparison of GTC-based versus SGC-based techniques |
|
|
GTC |
SGC |
|
|
|
|
works best either with high (300 mg) or very low (20 mg) amount of tissue, because of phenol-chloroform follows by ethanol precipitation steps and uses of denaturants and RNase inhibitors |
works best with low (<100 mg) amount of tissue, because filters may clog resulting in low yield of total RNA |
|
|
|
|
Several chemical treatment steps in protocol may affect RNA quality |
Limited steps in protocol may not have influences on RNA intactness |
|
|
|
|
Complex protocol, takes 4 hrs |
Simple protocol, takes only 20 min |
|
|
|
|
chemically based aqueous-phase procedure, increased risk of cross contamination |
No phase separation step present, low risk of cross contamination |
|
|
|
|
Use of hazardous chemicals like phenol and chloroform requires specific safety rules in the laboratory |
Absolutely safe while handling. |
|
|
|
|
less expensive than SGC method |
More expensive than GTC method |
|
|
|
|
Muyal et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2009 4:9 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-4-9 |
|