Comments(1)Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |
![]() | ![]() ![]() | Log on / register BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details |
|
|
| © 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. |
On number of sections and statistical power
Vincenzo Della Mea (10 February 2009) University of Udine, Italy
After having attended the Authors' congress presentation, I read the paper with much interest, because it depicts very well a protocol for obtaining reliable results from image analysis on histological sections.
However I would like to point out that the section entitled "Number of sections has little influence on statistical power of the study" reports a result well known since many years: statistical accuracy of a study depends more on the number of subjects enrolled than on the number of samples within the same subject, according to the Gundersen expression “Do more less well” (1). When dealing with rare condition, taking more samples from few subjects seems a shortcut for obtaining statistically significant results, but is not always the case.
(1) Gundersen HJG, Osterby R. Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or “do more less well!”. J Microsc 1981; 121-65.
Competing interests
none
top