Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details

Comments(1)

Object orientated automated image analysis: quantitative and qualitative estimation of inflammation in mouse lung

Coralie Apfeldorfer email, Kristina Ulrich, Gareth Jones, David Goodwin, Susie Collins, Emanuel Schenck and Virgile Richard

Diagnostic Pathology 2008, 3(Suppl 1):S16doi:10.1186/1746-1596-3-S1-S16

On number of sections and statistical power

Vincenzo Della Mea   (10 February 2009)  University of Udine, Italy

After having attended the Authors' congress presentation, I read the paper with much interest, because it depicts very well a protocol for obtaining reliable results from image analysis on histological sections.

However I would like to point out that the section entitled "Number of sections has little influence on statistical power of the study" reports a result well known since many years: statistical accuracy of a study depends more on the number of subjects enrolled than on the number of samples within the same subject, according to the Gundersen expression “Do more less well” (1). When dealing with rare condition, taking more samples from few subjects seems a shortcut for obtaining statistically significant results, but is not always the case.

(1) Gundersen HJG, Osterby R. Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or “do more less well!”. J Microsc 1981; 121-65.

Competing interests

none

top

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.