Table 2 |
|||||
|
Expression of EBV and Topo II∝ in the normal oral tissues, oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinomas |
|||||
|
HISTOLOGY |
Number of cases |
EBV expression(%)(a) |
P-value |
Topo II-∝ LI (%)(b) |
P-value |
|
|
|||||
|
NSE |
20 |
0.000 ± 0.000 |
d |
5.35 ± 2.22 |
c |
|
OED |
16 |
25.6 ± 25.38 |
14.08 ± 2.99 |
||
|
Mild |
7 |
13.43 ± 13.24 |
NS |
12.27 ± 2.17 |
NS |
|
Moderate |
5 |
24.00 ± 22.62 |
13.50 ± 1.86 |
||
|
Severe |
4 |
48.75 ± |
17.98 ± 1.51 |
||
|
OSCC |
22 |
41.79 ± 29.31 |
27.56 ± 7.49 |
||
|
W-scc |
10 |
36.09 ± 22.37 |
22.40 ± 3.19 |
||
|
M-scc |
8 |
41.15 ± 33.18 |
NS |
28.54 ± 4.84 |
e |
|
P-scc |
4 |
57.33 ± 38.91 |
39.00 ± 6.45 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
NSE, normal squamous epithelium; OED, OraLepithelial dysplasia; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; NS, not significant. a mean ± standered deviation of EBV b mean ± standered deviation of Topo II-α LI. c NSE vs. OED P < 0.001;NSE vs. SCC, P < 0.001; OED vs. SCC, P = 0.083. dNSE vs. OED P < 0.001;NSE vs. SCC, P < 0.001; OED vs. SCC, P < 0.001. eW-SCC vs. M-SCC, P = 0.008; W-SCC 1 vs.P-SCC, P = 0.001; W-SCC vs. M-SCC +P-SCC, P < 0.001. |
|||||
|
Shamaa et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2008 3:45 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-3-45 |
|||||