Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Diagnostic Pathology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Case Report

Cytokeratin positivity in myxopapillary ependymoma – a potential diagnostic pitfall

Sundus A Hussein1 and Monalisa Sur12*

Author affiliations

1 Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2 Department of Anatomical Pathology, Henderson General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

Diagnostic Pathology 2008, 3:40  doi:10.1186/1746-1596-3-40

Published: 19 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPE) occur in the filum terminale of the spinal cord, but also present in extra-spinal locations such as subcutaneous tissue and brain. They are slow growing grade I gliomas. Areas of solid growth pattern with aggregates of cells with "epithelioid morphology" seen in MPE can mimic metastatic carcinoma. The presence of occasional cells with clear cytoplasm and morphology can resemble Chordoma. Diagnosis can be missed due to these morphological similarities, which could affect patient management and hence, long term survival.

Case presentation

We describe two cases of MPE with cytokeratin (AE1 AE3, CAM 5.2, Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20) expression.

Conclusion

MPE can be positive for Cytokeratins (CAM 5.2, AE1 AE3, CK7) and focally for EMA, which could be misdiagnosed as metastatic carcinoma. In cases demonstrating epithelioid and clear cell morphology, the diagnosis of MPE should be made in conjunction with histology, proper immunohistochemical profile which includes co-expression of GFAP, S-100 protein and epithelial markers, radiologic findings and site. It is important to be aware of the cytokeratin profile in MPE to avoid erroneous diagnosis with other tumour entities.