Table 3 |
||||
|
Result of logistic analysis |
||||
|
Variables |
EBER+/N1 |
(%) |
OR2 |
95% CI2 |
|
|
||||
|
Gender |
||||
|
Female |
1/76 |
(1) |
1 |
reference |
|
Male |
8/188 |
(4) |
0.3 |
0.01–2.96 |
|
P = 0.595 |
||||
|
Age |
||||
|
≥ 70 |
1/36 |
(3) |
1 |
reference |
|
50–69 |
5/180 |
(3) |
0.8 |
0.08–44.62 |
|
<50 |
3/54 |
(6) |
1.3 |
0.08–81.25 |
|
P for trend = 1.0 |
||||
|
Location |
||||
|
Upper |
1/71 |
(1) |
1 |
reference |
|
Middle |
5/64 |
(8) |
6.0 |
0.1–77.86 |
|
Lower |
3/130 |
(2) |
1.4 |
0.63–296.7 |
|
P for heterogeneity = 1.64 |
||||
|
Histology |
||||
|
Diffuse |
8/121 |
(7) |
1 |
reference |
|
Intestinal |
1/152 |
(1) |
0.08 |
0.002–0.64 |
|
P = 0.009 |
||||
|
Invasion |
||||
|
Muscle |
3/33 |
(9) |
1 |
reference |
|
serose |
6/222 |
(3) |
3.6 |
0.47–24.03 |
|
P = 0.243 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
1Total number in each group; 2OR and 95% confidence interval were obtained from exact test of binary logistic analysis. |
||||
|
Abdirad et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2007 2:25 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-2-25 |
||||
