Table 2 |
|||
|
Distribution of EBER-1 positive gastric carcinomas by histological type and gender |
|||
|
Histology1 |
Male |
Female |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBER+/N2 (%) |
EBER+/N (%) |
EBER+/N (%) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Intestinal |
1/113 (1) |
0/39 (0) |
1/152 (1) |
|
pap |
0/11 (0) |
0/3 (0) |
0/14 (0) |
|
tub1 |
0/36 (0) |
0/11 (0) |
0/47 (0) |
|
tub2 |
1/50 (2) |
0/16 (0) |
1/66 (1) |
|
muc |
0/16 (0) |
0/9 (0) |
0/25 (0) |
|
Diffuse |
7/83 (8) |
1/38 (3) |
8/121 (7) |
|
por1 |
3/34 (8) |
1/16 (6) |
4/50 (8) |
|
por2 |
4/40 (10) |
0/18 (0) |
4/58 (8) |
|
sig |
0/9 (0) |
0/4 (0) |
0/13 (0) |
|
|
|||
|
1 pap:papillary adenocarcinoma; tub1:well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma; tub2:moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por1:solid poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; por2:non-solid poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; sig: signet ring cell carcinoma; muc:mucinous carcinoma; 2 total number of cases in each group (Based on Japanese research society for gastric cancer) |
|||
|
Abdirad et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2007 2:25 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-2-25 |
|||
