Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Diagnostic Pathology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Case Report

Differential diagnosis of laryngeal spindle cell carcinoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor – report of two cases with similar morphology

Hans-Ullrich Völker1*, Matthias Scheich2, Sylvia Höller1, Philipp Ströbel1, Rudolf Hagen2, Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink1 and Matthias Eck1

Author affiliations

1 Institute of Pathology, University, Josef-Schneider-Str.2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University, Josef-Schneider-Str.2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

Diagnostic Pathology 2007, 2:1  doi:10.1186/1746-1596-2-1

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/2/1/1


Received:4 December 2006
Accepted:9 January 2007
Published:9 January 2007

© 2007 Völker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Spindle cell tumors of the larynx are rare. In some cases, the dignity is difficult to determine. We report two cases of laryngeal spindle cell tumors.

Case presentation

Case 1 is a spindle cell carcinoma (SPC) in a 55 year-old male patient and case 2 an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) in a 34 year-old female patient. A comprehensive morphological and immunohistochemical analysis was done. Both tumors arose at the vocal folds. Magnified laryngoscopy showed polypoid tumors. After resection, conventional histological investigation revealed spindle cell lesions with similar morphology. We found ulceration, mild atypia, and myxoid stroma. Before immunohistochemistry, the dignity was uncertain. Immunohistochemical investigations led to diagnosis of two distinct tumors with different biological behaviour. Both expressed vimentin. Furthermore, the SPC was positive for pan-cytokeratin AE1/3, CK5/6, and smooth-muscle actin, whereas the IMT reacted with antibodies against ALK-1, and EMA. The proliferation (Ki67) was up to 80% in SPC and 10% in IMT. Other stainings with antibodies against p53, p21, Cyclin D1, or Rb did not result in additional information. After resection, the patient with SPC is free of disease for seven months. The IMT recurred three months after first surgery, but no relapses were found eight months after resurgery.

Conclusion

Differential diagnosis can be difficult without immunohistochemistry. Therefore, a comprehensive morphological and immunohistochemical analysis is necessary, but markers of cell cycle (apart from the assessment of proliferation) do not help.

Background

The most common type of malignant laryngeal tumors is the classical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Benign tumors of the larnyx are divided in two groups: mesenchymal and epithelial lesions. The latter harbours particular papillomas, whereas simple vocal cord polyps, Reinke edema, or e.g. leiomyomas have a mesenchymal origin. A further group are tumorous inflammatory lesions, such as granulomatous polyps. Most of these different entities show a characteristic histomorphology, so that the diagnosis might be unproblematic for the histopathologist.

Spindle cell lesions of the larynx are rare (1.3%) [1]. Such tumors usually require immunohistochemical investigations for detailed histopathological specification. In some cases, the dignity is difficult to determine.

We demonstrate a spindle cell carcinoma (SPC) and an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), two laryngeal spindle cell tumors with complete different dignity, and discuss the differential diagnosis focusing on the immunohistochemical results.

Case presentation

Clinical data

Case one

A 55 year-old male patient with relapsing dyspnoe and five pneumonias within the last four years was referred to our ENT hospital with progressive dyspnoe and dysphonia for five months. The patient was a smoker with 30 pack years, no alcohol abuse. He did not show any other systemic symptoms. Flexible transnasal laryngoscopy showed a laryngeal mass without visible glottis. Subsequently, microlaryngoscopy with laser resection of the ulcerated tumor (diameter 3 cm) was performed. The tumor originated from the right vocal fold. Histologically, a spindle cell carcinoma (SPC) was diagnosed. In a second surgery no remnants were found. The cervical lymph nodes were unsuspicious in ultrasound and computertomographic investigation. Therefore, neck dissection was not carried out. The patient is free of disease seven months after surgery.

Case two

A 34 year-old female patient with increasing dysphonia for one month was referred to our ENT hospital. She had neither a history of smoking nor alcohol abuse. Magnified laryngoscopy showed a polyp (0.8 cm) of the right vocal fold. Examination was followed by microlaryngoscopy with macroscopically complete resection. In a postoperative control ten days after surgery, a small nodule was found and suspected as a granulomatous polyp. Logopedic therapy led to a subjective voice improvement within the next three months. However, further magnified laryngoscopy showed an increasing size of the nodule. The following resection of a round tumor with 1.2 cm diameter was macroscopically and histologically complete. Eight months after surgery the patient is free of disease.

Histopathological and immunohistochemical methods

After surgical resection, routinely processed paraffin blocks were cut at 2 μm and put on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APES) coated slides. Sections were first stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and periodic acid Schiff (PAS) reaction.

Cuts for immunohistochemistry were air-dried over night, dewaxed, rehydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol before being heated for antigen unmasking in 10 mM citric acid (pH 5.5) for five minutes. After rinsing with distilled water, slides were washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). For staining, the Histostain-Plus bulk kit (Zymed) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol: 15 min blocking reagent, primary antibody incubation for one hour, rinsing with PBS (pH 7.4), biotinylated secondary antibody incubation for 20 minutes, rinsing with PBS, streptavidin peroxidase 20 minutes, and rinsing with PBS. Staining was performed by adding 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma) with subsequent counterstaining using haemalaun. The antibodies, sources, and dilutions used are indicated in table 1. In a first series, standard stainings for presumed diagnoses were carried out, a second was added obtaining further information. After the final diagnosis, an EBER (EBV-encoded RNA) in situ hybridization of case two was performed (EBER probe Y-5200, PNA-ISH-Detection Kit K-5201, Dako).

Table 1. Immunohistochemistry

All stainings are used in routine investigations and the antibodies were tested in suitable positive controls.

Results

Case one

In HE staining, an ulcerated spindle cell tumor with widely myxoid stroma changes was found. Tumor cells were arranged in an irregular pattern with different cell density (figure 1a). No PAS positivity was found, necrosis was absent. Spindle cells showed mild to moderate atypia with prominent nucleoli. Ten high power fields (HPF) contained a maximum of one mitosis (figure 1b), and no atypical mitoses were found. Focally, the tumor was scantily infiltrated by neutrophil granulocytes. The surface epithelium was only detectable on a small focus, herein no atypia was found in the surface epithelium. The results of immunohistochemical investigations are indicated in table 1. The tumor was strongly positive for vimentin (figure 1c) and different cytokeratins including the squamous differentiation marker CK5/6 (figure 1d). Only pan-cytokeratin MNF116 was negative in the tumor cells, but reacted with the surface epithelium. Smooth-muscle (sm)-actin (figure 1e) was coexpressed. The proliferation (determined by Ki67 staining) was up to 80 % (figure 1f). Due to these features a spindle cell carcinoma was diagnosed. Together with the clinical information, the tumor stage was pT2, cN0, cM0, and (after resurgery) R0.

thumbnailFigure 1. Spindle cell carcinoma. 1a: Spindle cell lesion with myxoid stroma (HE ×200). 1b: Mild to moderate atypia in tumor cells with rare mitoses (HE ×400). 1c: Vimentin immunoperoxidase – strong expression in tumor cells (×400). 1d: Pan-cytokeratin AE1/3 immunoperoxidase (×400). 1e: smooth muscle actin immunoperoxidase (×400). 1f: Proliferation (Ki67) up to 80% (immunoperoxidase ×200).

Case two

This lesion showed an organized growth pattern of spindle cells. Most of the tumor stroma was myxoid (figure 2a). The tumor had regular small blood vessels and capillaries similar to granulation tissue. A scanty infiltration with inflammatory cells (dominated by lymphocytes) was found. Plasma cells were rare, neutrophils were absent. No necrosis was found. Tumor cells showed only mild atypia (figure 2b). The spindle shaped nuclei presented mostly blunt ends. Chromatin was evenly distributed, nucleoli were not visible. We did not identify mitoses. As proof of our final diagnosis of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, immunohistochemistry revealed an expression of ALK-1 (figure 2c). Corresponding to the benign character, the proliferation (Ki67) was less than 10 % (figure 2d). Table 1 shows other results of immunohistochemical investigations. The EBER in situ hybridization did not reveal an infection with Ebstein-Bar-Virus (EBV). The relapse was a sharply confined nodule below an intact surface epithelium (figure 2e). The cell density was higher and myxoid changes were absent (figure 2f). No mitoses were found, but mild atypia. The number of inflammatory cells was reduced. Immunohistochemical pattern was identical to the primary lesion.

thumbnailFigure 2. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. 2a: Spindle cell lesion with more regular pattern than in 1a, myxoid degeneration, vessels similar to granulation tissue, infiltration with inflammatory cells (HE ×200). 2b: Lack of atypia in tumor cells, resembling regular myofibroblasts (HE ×400). 2c: Diagnostic expression of ALK-1 immunoperoxidase (×400). 2d: Low proliferation (Ki67), less 10% (immunoperoxidase ×400). 2e: Relapse tumor, sharply confined surfaced with intact epithelium (HE ×40). 2f: Higher cellularity, no myxoid changes, less inflammatory cells, but mild atypia in the relapse (HE ×400).

Apart from the diagnostic areas shown, both cases contained distended spindle cell components with a high degree of overlapping histomorphology in conventional HE stain.

Conclusion

We demonstrated two cases of laryngeal spindle cell tumors with complete different dignity. The first case was a spindle cell carcinoma (SPC), the second an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT). Because of similar morphology, only comprehensive immunohistochemical investigations allowed the correct final diagnoses and the aligned assessment of biological behaviour.

According to the recent WHO definition, laryngeal SPCs represent biphasic tumors, composed of a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), either in situ or invasive, and a malignant spindle cell component with mesenchymal appearance [2], but of an evident monoclonal epithelial origin [3]. Obsolete synonyms are sarcomatoid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, collision tumor, or pseudosarcoma. Males in the 6th and 7th decade are predisposed (reported male to female ratio is 10:1) [4,5]. The vocal fold is the most common site of involvement [5]. Risk factors correspond to common SCC: cigarette smoking and alcohol abuse [4]. Some SPCs seem to develop after radiation [5,6], but a strong evidence of this hypothesis is missing. The prognosis of SPCs is discussed controversially. One quarter metastasizes in regional lymph nodes, distant metastases occur in 5–15% [5]. These often contain usual SCC with or without spindle cell component. Rarely, only the spindle cell component occurs [6]. Five year survival is reported to be 65–95% [1,5]. Low tumor stage and absence of previous irradiation indicate a better prognosis. Besides, improved survival rates are associated with a low level of cytokeratin expression [6].

The differential diagnosis includes, apart from rare laryngeal sarcomas, reactive or benign spindle cell proliferations, such as nodular fasciitis, IMT, or low grade myofibroblastic sarcoma.

IMTs are neoplasms with borderline dignity [2]. They are composed of myofibroblastic cells and intermingled inflammatory cells, especially plasma cells [7]. Nowadays, obsolete synonyms are inflammatory pseudotumor, plasma cell granuloma, plasma cell pseudotumor, or pseudosarcomatous lesion/tumor [2]. The latter is similar to the synonymous "pseudosarcoma" for SPC and might lead to severe misunderstandings. The most common location is the lung, followed by soft tissue and viscera. IMT of the head and neck, especially of the larynx, are rare [7,8]. Coffin described 12 cases of head and neck IMTs among 84 extrapulmonary IMTs, and only three were located in the larynx [7]. 19 cases of laryngeal IMTs have been reported in the literature. All cases are listed in table 2. In distinction to IMTs occuring in other sites, predominantly in children or young adults, IMTs of the larynx affect adults with a median age of 57 years (2–74). The male to female ratio is 1.8:1. Only one case is reported in a child [9]. The prognosis is excellent. Metastases are possible, but were not decribed for IMTs of head and neck and did not occur in the reported cases [7]. The recurrence rate was 21%. Most relapses occurred within 12 months after initial surgery, perhaps due to incomplete resection in most instances. One problem for surgeons is the lack of a line of demarcation surrounding the lesion. Radical surgery is reserved for more aggressive cases [8-10]. However, a total laryngectomy was necessary only in one of all IMTs reported [8]. Some patients profit from corticosteroid [11] and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory treatment[12].

Table 2. Synopsis of all 19 laryngeal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors published in the English literature.

The etiology of IMTs is unknown. The idea of a reactive lesion was refuted by genetic studies. The clonal origin is evident [13,14] and chromosomal abnormalities involving 2p23 [15,16], and fusion of the ALK gene with tropomyosin 3 (TPM3-ALK) or tropomyosin 4 (TPM4-ALK) is found in a subset [17]. Gene rearrangement and gene activation are restricted to the myofibroblastic component. Some authors assume an association with a trauma. Alaani et al. have documented a causal relation between local laryngeal trauma and IMT [10], Wenig et al. found an IMT after traumatic intubation [8]. Furthermore, immunosuppression, unspecific infections, infections of HHV8 [18] and EBV [19] were identified in IMT and an overexpression of IL-6 and cyclin D1 (confirmed by our investigations) have been reported [18]. In the case we have presented, we could not affirm any infectious genesis.

Clinically, IMT can mimic a neoplastic process. Patients suffer from hoarseness, dysphonia, or foreign body sensations in the troath. Constitutional or systemic signs (fever, weight loss, anaemia) are usually missing in extrapulmonary IMTs. Systemic alterations are only reported in one laryngeal IMT [20].

The diagnosis of IMTs can be difficult due to the wide morphological spectrum. Coffin et al. have described three morphologic patterns:

1. spindle cells in a myxoid background with a vascular and inflammatory component (nodular fasciitis like)

2. compact spindle cells in a solid confluent area or as irregular foci in areas of dense collagen (fibrous histiocytoma like)

3. collagen dense pattern similar to desmoid fibromatosis [7].

Our case of IMT first presented as variant one with relapse as variant two. Alaani et al. described in a relapsed IMT a progressive diminution of inflammatory cells, reduction of atypia and more collagenous, less myxoid stroma up to osteoblastic changes [10]. A transformation of an IMT to higher malignancy is possible, especially in cases with repeated recurrences.

According to Coffin et al., immunohistochemical investigations could reveal an expression of vimentin in 99%, sm-actin in 92%, focally desmin in 69%, cytokeratins in 36%, CD68 in 24%, and CD30 in 6% [7]. The reported laryngeal IMT expressed consistently vimentin and actin, but none of the other markers. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene expression is detectable in IMTs, often in children and young adults under 40 [14-17,21]. Only two laryngeal IMTs (including our case) have a reported staining with antibodies against ALK-1. The importance of ALK expression regarding the prognosis is controversially discussed. Chun et al. found a better prognosis in cases with ALK expression [22], whereas Coffin et al. found a recurrence in 45% of ALK-positive and 20% of ALK-negative IMTs [16]. The malignant transformation seems independent of ALK expression [16].

The differential diagnosis of IMT comprises low grade myofibroblastic sarcomas as well as a long list of benign, reactive, or neoplastic spindle cell lesions, such as leiomyoma, solitary fibrous tumor, spindle cell carcinoma, nodular fasciitis, and peripheral nerve sheet tumor [20]. Morphology and immunohistochemical profile help to rule out these entities, whereby low grade myofibroblastic sarcoma can be difficult to distinguish due to the low or mild atypia and low proliferations index [23]. The best discrimination of this malignant neoplasm with favorable prognosis is the occurrence of local infiltrative growth [20,23].

As mentioned above, SPC is also an important differential diagnosis. But if the diagnosis cannot be made on the basis of conventional histomorphology, it becomes even more difficult. Typically, SPCs contain pleomorphic malignant spindle cells with mitoses (including atypical mitoses). Most of them are associated with epithelial dysplasia or common SCC [5]. Our case of SPC showed similarities with IMT in some areas. We found only mild atypia, hypocellular myxoid degeneration and no association with dysplasia of the surface epithelium. So we were not able to diagnose a SPC with HE staining alone. However, immunohistochemistry was evident for SPC/IMT (SPC: cytokeratin and vimentin positive, ALK-1 negative versus IMT: ALK-1 and vimentin positive, cytokeratins negative). Problems arise in an ambiguous staining pattern: SPCs express cytokeratins only in 40–85% and IMTs in up to 75% [5,7,8,24-26]. In our SPC, not all pan-cytokeratins (MNF 116) were expressed. In such cases, the p63 antibody is helpful [27]. An expression of sm-actin is reported in SPC and IMT [1,7,8], we found it only in SPC. In contrast to that, all laryngeal IMTs in literature expressed actin (table 2). An expression of ALK-1 is typical, but only one half of IMT are positive. And interestingly, positivity in patients over 40 years is less likely (whereas IMTs of the head and neck occurs in the 5th/6th decade) [28,29]. Therefore, even comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis could fail in revealing the right diagnosis.

Hussong et al. described an overexpression of p53 in one of six IMT with recurrence and in one of two with malignant transformation, but in none without [30]. Even if Ledet et al. found p53 only in malignancies but not in IMTs [31]. But an expression of p53 seems to be not a sure sign of malignant behavior. Yamamoto et al. described p53 positivity in 6.7% of all IMTs [29], Brooks et al. detected it in an oral IMT without recurrence or malignancy [28]. However, the highest number of investigated IMTs is a study of 24 cases (including six recurrences and two malignant IMTs) [30]. Therefore, p53 seems to be not sufficient criterion for differential diagnosis. Bcl-2 expression is reported in 38% of IMT without relation to recurrence or malignant transformation [30]. Expression of cyclin D1 and Rb was described [18,28], the value of p21 is not assessed. The degree of cellularity, mitoses, and the extent of inflammatory cells showed no correlation to more aggressive behavior [30], but the presence of aneuploidy [16], atypia and ganglion-like cells do [30]. Reliable criteria with a high predictive value regarding the biological behavior of IMTs do not exist so far.

In summary, the differential diagnosis of SPC and IMT can be difficult, particularly in cases with uncommon immunohistochemical profile. Therefore, a comprehensive morphological and immunohistochemical analysis is necessary, but markers of cell cycle (apart from assessment of proliferation) do not help.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HUV and MS drafted the manuscript, HUV, SH, PS, and ME evaluated the immunohistochemical stainings and confirmed the diagnoses, MS and RH compiled the clinical data, HKM and ME mainly contributed to the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Petra Stempfle and Erwin Schmitt for their excellent technical assistance.

References

  1. Marioni G, Bottin R, Staffieri A, Altavilla G: Spindle-cell tumours of the larynx: diagnostic pitfalls. A case report and review of the literature.

    Acta Otolaryngol 2003, 123:86-90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P and Sidransky D (Eds): Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours, Volume 9 , World Health Organization; 2005.

  3. Torenbeek R, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, Baak JP, Meijer CJ: Analysis by comparative genomic hybridization of epithelial and spindle cell components in sarcomatoid carcinoma and carcinosarcoma: histogenetic aspects.

    J Pathol 1999, 189:338-343. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Miyahara H, Tsuruta Y, Yane K, Ogawa Y: Spindle cell carcinoma of the larynx.

    Auris Nasus Larynx 2004, 31:177-182. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Lewis JE, Olsen KD, Sebo TJ: Spindle cell carcinoma of the larynx: review of 26 cases including DNA content and immunohistochemistry.

    Hum Pathol 1997, 28:664-673. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Thompson LD, Wieneke JA, Miettinen M, Heffner DK: Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 187 cases.

    Am J Surg Pathol 2002, 26:153-170. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP: Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases.

    Am J Surg Pathol 1995, 19:859-872. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  8. Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neoplasm.

    Cancer 1995, 76:2217-2229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Rodrigues M, Taylor RJ, Sun CC, Wolf JS: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx in a 2-year-old male.

    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005, 67:101-105. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Alaani A, Hogg R, Warfield AT, Olliff J, Jennings C: Air bag injury as a cause of inflammatory myofibroblastic pseudotumour of the subglottic larynx progressing to myositis ossificans.

    Acta Otolaryngol 2005, 125:674-677. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Suh SI, Seol HY, Lee JH, Lee YH, Kim TK, Lee NJ, Woo JS, Kim IS: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx.

    Head Neck 2006, 28:369-372. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Su W, Ko A, O'Connell T, Applebaum H: Treatment of pseudotumors with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

    J Pediatr Surg 2000, 35:1635-1637. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Ma Z, Hill DA, Collins MH, Morris SW, Sumegi J, Zhou M, Zuppan C, Bridge JA: Fusion of ALK to the Ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2) gene in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.

    Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 37:98-105. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Su LD, Atayde-Perez A, Sheldon S, Fletcher JA, Weiss SW: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: cytogenetic evidence supporting clonal origin.

    Mod Pathol 1998, 11:364-368. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  15. Griffin CA, Hawkins AL, Dvorak C, Henkle C, Ellingham T, Perlman EJ: Recurrent involvement of 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

    Cancer Res 1999, 59:2776-2780. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Coffin CM, Patel A, Perkins S, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Perlman E, Griffin CA: ALK1 and p80 expression and chromosomal rearrangements involving 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.

    Mod Pathol 2001, 14:569-576. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Lawrence B, Perez-Atayde A, Hibbard MK, Rubin BP, Dal Cin P, Pinkus JL, Pinkus GS, Xiao S, Yi ES, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA: TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

    Am J Pathol 2000, 157:377-384. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Gomez-Roman JJ, Ocejo-Vinyals G, Sanchez-Velasco P, Nieto EH, Leyva-Cobian F, Val-Bernal JF: Presence of human herpesvirus-8 DNA sequences and overexpression of human IL-6 and cyclin D1 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor).

    Lab Invest 2000, 80:1121-1126. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  19. Arber DA, Kamel OW, van de Rijn M, Davis RE, Medeiros LJ, Jaffe ES, Weiss LM: Frequent presence of the Epstein-Barr virus in inflammatory pseudotumor.

    Hum Pathol 1995, 26:1093-1098. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Guilemany JM, Alos L, Alobid I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Cardesa A: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in the larynx: clinicopathologic features and histogenesis.

    Acta Otolaryngol 2005, 125:215-219. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Sirvent N, Hawkins AL, Moeglin D, Coindre JM, Kurzenne JY, Michiels JF, Barcelo G, Turc-Carel C, Griffin CA, Pedeutour F: ALK probe rearrangement in a t(2;11;2)(p23;p15;q31) translocation found in a prenatal myofibroblastic fibrous lesion: toward a molecular definition of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor family?

    Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2001, 31:85-90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Chun YS, Wang L, Nascimento AG, Moir CR, Rodeberg DA: Pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression and prognosis.

    Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005, 45:796-801. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Fisher C: Myofibroblastic malignancies.

    Adv Anat Pathol 2004, 11:190-201. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Zarbo RJ, Crissman JD, Venkat H, Weiss MA: Spindle-cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract mucosa. An immunohistologic and ultrastructural study of 18 biphasic tumors and comparison with seven monophasic spindle-cell tumors.

    Am J Surg Pathol 1986, 10:741-753. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Slootweg PJ, Roholl PJ, Muller H, Lubsen H: Spindle-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and larynx. Immunohistochemical aspects.

    J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989, 17:234-236. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  26. Toda S, Yonemitsu N, Miyabara S, Sugihara H, Maehara N: Polypoid squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. An immunohistochemical study for ras p21 and cytokeratin.

    Pathol Res Pract 1989, 185:860-866. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  27. Lewis JS, Ritter JH, El-Mofty S: Alternative epithelial markers in sarcomatoid carcinomas of the head and neck, lung, and bladder-p63, MOC-31, and TTF-1.

    Mod Pathol 2005, 18:1471-1481. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Brooks JK, Nikitakis NG, Frankel BF, Papadimitriou JC, Sauk JJ: Oral inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor demonstrating ALK, p53, MDM2, CDK4, pRb, and Ki-67 immunoreactivity in an elderly patient.

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005, 99:716-726. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Yamamoto H, Oda Y, Saito T, Sakamoto A, Miyajima K, Tamiya S, Tsuneyoshi M: p53 Mutation and MDM2 amplification in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours.

    Histopathology 2003, 42:431-439. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Hussong JW, Brown M, Perkins SL, Dehner LP, Coffin CM: Comparison of DNA ploidy, histologic, and immunohistochemical findings with clinical outcome in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

    Mod Pathol 1999, 12:279-286. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  31. Ledet SC, Brown RW, Cagle PT: p53 immunostaining in the differentiation of inflammatory pseudotumor from sarcoma involving the lung.

    Mod Pathol 1995, 8:282-286. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  32. Kendall CH, Johnston MN: Pseudo-malignant laryngeal nodule (inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour).

    Histopathology 1998, 32:286-287. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Ereno C, Lopez JI, Grande J, Santaolalla F, Bilbao FJ: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the larynx.

    J Laryngol Otol 2001, 115:856-858. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Corsi A, Ciofalo A, Leonardi M, Zambetti G, Bosman C: Recurrent inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the glottis mimicking malignancy.

    Am J Otolaryngol 1997, 18:121-126. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Martinez S, Bosch R, Pardo J, Salvado MT, Alvaro T: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of larynx.

    J Laryngol Otol 2001, 115:140-142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL